Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New South Wales Police killed in the line of duty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of New South Wales Police killed in the line of duty[edit]

Memorial page. If any of the incidents themselves are notable, we should write articles for them, and could potentially have a "List of incidents in which NSW police officers dies in the line of duty", as it stands, this page is just a memorial. -- Mark Chovain 01:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC) -- Mark Chovain 01:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - delete per nomination. Xdenizen (talk) 01:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a memorial. KleenupKrew (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 02:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Fairly clear precendents have been set regarding articles such as this. There is a link to the police honour roll included in this article, the appropriate location for this material. Perhaps the link could be included in the New South Wales Police Force article -- Mattinbgn\^talk 02:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge reference to appropriate article and delete. Wikipedia isn't a memorial, but we shouldn't delete viable references. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 03:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I created the list to unclutter the parent page on the NSW Police. As Mattinbgn said, I place a link on the parent page. Journeyman (talk) 03:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#MEMORIAL Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 13:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Lord Foppington (talk) 17:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - non-notable. Dreamspy (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete As before wikipedia is not a memorial site, but a merge would be good to but it would make no sense at all.Pookeo9 ^{Say What you Want} —Preceding comment was added at 21:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the only thing to include in the other article is the link to the honor role, at the most. As all police forces have them a link to the main web site would quite possibly be enough by itself. DGG (talk) 03:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as pointed out before, Wikipedia is not a memorial. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete: per WP:NOT#MEMORIAL. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 23:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom -bdude the duck (talk) 03:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.