Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Naruto Birthdays
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per consensus and by copyvio pointed out by Squilibob. --Coredesat 03:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List of Naruto Birthdays[edit]
- List of Naruto Birthdays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fansite information?--Burning Flame 05:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as fancruft and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Anyone interested in these birthdays can see the information already in individual character articles, doubtful to be notable in the series itself. Pomte 06:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Pomte's comments. Separate article not needed, no notable information in article. --JaimeLesMaths (talk!edits) 08:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Moved from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystics, Shattered Galaxy Gaming Regiment. MER-C 11:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - obvious fancruft. MER-C 11:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Blatantly fancruft. I have no idea why anyone would care enough about this to create the article. J Milburn 12:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. --Farix (Talk) 12:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I would normally say merge into the characters' infoboxes but I'm hesitant to do so as the only source given is a fansite. But as a standalone list, it shouldn't exist. --Farix (Talk) 12:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fancruft. Yonatanh 13:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, possibly speedy if no one wants to wait. -- Ned Scott 15:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Wryspy 19:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and I would say speedy per WP:SNOW. --Dennisthe2 23:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an arbitrary collection of crufy information, violating WP:FICT.-- danntm T C 05:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems to be copied, word for word, from [1] --Squilibob 23:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and we may as well call this as per WP:SNOW. Non-notable information (as it hasn't actually been used in the series, as far as I remember) and is pretty much the definition of an indescriminate collection of information. Cheers, Lankybugger 19:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The information is also included on the character pages as well, referenced from the infobooks. Cheers, Lankybugger 19:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.