Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miley Jab Hum Tum characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Miley Jab Hum Tum characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of chaacters of a not so notable TV show. Unreferenced for verification as well as proving notability. Fails WP:GNG §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and cleanup. Material can presumably be sourced to primary sources, and notable TV shows typically have a list article of characters like this to forestall creation of individual articles for not-individually-notable characters. Jclemens (talk) 23:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The whole set of the characters of the show is non-notable. Hence the deletion nomination. Find secondary independent sources, give sufficient coverage and then we can keep the list as a separate article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.-- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 18:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- There are no sources whatsoever and the content is entirely in-universe plot summary. Per the WP:GNG, we would need independent secondary sources to justify a stand-alone article and there aren't any. And the existence of the show does not justify an unlimited proliferation of crufty articles related to it. So there should not be a stand-alone article. The next question to consider is a merge. For a merge to work, we would need to be alble to identify usable content that would benefit the proposed merge target. Since all that's in this article is unsourced in-universe plot summary, I don't think any of it is any good. Reyk _YO! 22:41, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing to verify evidence of notability, which is required by the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.