Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MegaMan Battle Network viruses
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. Larry V (talk | contribs) 07:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of MegaMan Battle Network viruses[edit]
- List of MegaMan Battle Network viruses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
A poorly-formatted list of inconsistently named extremely minor opponents in a game series. This list of minor, interchangeable viruses is comparable to a list of every single piece of furniture in the Final Fantasy series, or every single kind of block in the Super Mario games. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a game guide. MER-C 06:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Nor for that matter is it a GameFAQs mirror. QuagmireDog 11:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 14:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of fictional diseases, though these might not even be notable for that. Koweja 14:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I would vote against that. The viruses in the game in question are computer viruses. --69.156.206.236 22:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point, it isn't relevant enough. I change to delete, though if someone wants to create a list of fictional computer viruses that would be acceptable. Koweja 22:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Listcruft, gamecruft, cruftcruft... -- Kicking222 15:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Huge, unmanageable and totally unencyclopedic. The Kinslayer 15:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Same reasons brought up by other users. --Benten 15:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NOT GameFAQs. Not worth merging. A Train take the 18:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Shouns 00:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Badly written, nearly indiscriminate, and better suited for a game guide where useful information like strategies could actually be included. Without the game guide info that we aren't allowed to keep here, it's useless. --tjstrf talk 02:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Why would anyone need this for anything other than a game guide? -Amarkov blahedits 16:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT and WP:VERIFY. -- Satori Son 05:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.