Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mario series items

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mario series items[edit]

This artice was PRODed, then contested at DRV. It is brought to AfD for full consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 13:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as listcruft. Wikipedia is not here to help out gamers get through the next level. Moreschi 13:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an indiscriminate list of information. Combination 14:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
According to the rules, indiscriminate lists of information lose all their lives automatically. Delete. Kavadi carrier 14:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. -- IslaySolomon | talk 17:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The notable Mario items already have their own articles. A list isn't needed. --- RockMFR 17:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOT a list of indiscriminate info. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 20:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Sheuynd 23:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think that combining most of the articles on things on this list should probably be merged into a single article, but this list, as it stands, isn't that article. Eluchil404 22:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 03:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (and cleanup). By no means is this featured list material, nor is it necessarily any good. However, it has the potential to be useful. Many of these items have their own articles, and if someone were looking for an item the name of which they didn't know, this list would be a place to start. It is not an indiscriminate collection of information because there are criteria for an item's inclusion, namely being in the Mario series. It is not an instruction manual either. Furthermore, it seems to me such a list would be more useful to someone who has never played a Mario game and is looking up a reference they saw outside a video game context (where these items do appear). It could be a very useful list, especially as it is annotated as well. --Keitei (talk) 09:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete The information is interesting yet useless. Delete as indiscriminate information I say! The Kinslayer 10:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NOT indiscriminate collection of information, not to mention WP:NOT instruction manual. Garrett^Talk 21:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.