Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Konami code websites

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Konami code websites[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested by anonymous IP with no explanation. Not a single entry in this list is verified through an independent reliable source, so presumably entirely a work of original research. The result is a directory of largely unnotable websites - fails WP:V and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Marasmusine (talk) 17:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Marasmusine (talk) 17:44, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There were some news stories after someone discovered the Konami Code on ESPN.com. They do mention a few other sites that use the Konami Code, but not enough to verify an entire list. Reach Out to the Truth 18:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above; also Wikipedia is not a linkfarm. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, but a brief mention (1 or 2 sentences) should be added to Konami Code if a RS citation can be found/confirmed. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. OR, no RS except primary sources. List of an arbitrary topic, with little benefit to the reader except to generate traffic to these sites. At best, some of prominent examples can be added to main article should any RS support that. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 00:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.