Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jedward TV Appearances

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jedward TV Appearances

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of mostly non-notable television appearances by a musical duo. Notable appearances should be mentioned at Jedward. anemoneprojectors talk 13:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (partial) and Redirect - agree with the nominator completely. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree it should be kept becuase having all the TV Appearances would make the main jedward page to clutered so i think this page should be kept this page has all the TV Appearances with refferences i suggest you also write you comments on the Jedward Talk page so other user can have their say. Sfxprefects (talk) 21:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not all their TV appearances should be mentioned. Any notable ones can be written as prose in the main article. anemoneprojectors talk 03:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back to the main article. The information is well cited and of encyclopedic significance, but it lacks the independent notability for a stand alone article. Them From Space 23:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree that it's of encyclopedic significance. Why do we need to know they were guests on all those shows? Most celebrities give interviews on television but they don't get mentioned because they're not important. It's just promotion. anemoneprojectors talk 00:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial Jedward TV Appearances includes the time they ripped their pants and swore on live TV and the time Michael Barrymore snogged their mother and slandered their father on live TV. It's all on Youtube and was the papers. Mega controversy everywhere they go. It says to explain how this meets Wikipedia policy and a policy is Wikipedia:Ignore all rules which says If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it. This is an obvious improvement so should be ignored. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.210.88 (talk) 02:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Which rule are you ignoring? anemoneprojectors talk 03:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Partial merge Only the notable appearances that can be reliably and verifiably sourced should be included at Jedward, all others are non-notable and can and should be binned. TheJazzDalek (talk) 16:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of these televised appearances are trivial at best, and would struggle to hold their own in the actual article. Giving them a separate article is complete and utterly moronic. --A Chain of Flowers (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trivia G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 19:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a complete list of every TV programme a pop group has appeared on isn't encyclopedic -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Completely trivial and wouldn't even be suitable for the main Jedward article. Imagine having this kind of list for every pop group, it would be madness. -- Big Dom 18:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a directory. I notvoted to keep Jedward themselves, based more on pageviews than anything else, but I do not wish to see anything else about them. Abductive (reasoning) 11:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.