Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jack Abramoff's tribal clients

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

List of Jack Abramoff's tribal clients

This article contains content that is not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. The article on Jack Abramoff is already very long, and contains many, many subpages. Some of this information could be integrated to one of the other articles, but most of it is just indiscriminate information relating to the Abramoff scandal. Each Abramoff list also contains little if any references, which makes me think that it is original research.

Since this is a sensitive political topic, I know some editors will accuse me of nominating this with a political agenda or motivation. In order to dispel this idea, I will point out that while I have also nominated List of trips funded by Jack Abramoff and List of Jack Abramoff-related organizations (and copied this description to each), I have not nominated Jack Abramoff timeline because I feel that is a better example of the kind of list that belongs on Wikipedia. Ultra-specific, unsourced lists related to already specific scandals and persons and their dealings do not belong on Wikipedia. Renesis (talk) 17:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Useful, but a short enough list that it could be merged into Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal. Koweja 22:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Koweja. -- Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 16:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jack Abramoff Indian lobbying scandal. --Ezeu 18:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm reopening this debate. I disagree with the decision to merge. Understanding the Jack Abramoff scandal is hard enough without being able to have useful summaries of different information. Forgive me if I'm not reopening this the right way -- I'm not sure of the right way to do it. Feel free to correct. --The Cunctator 19:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]