Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Internet Relay Chat commands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 07:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Internet Relay Chat commands

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a very weird one, and I'm not even sure if this is the right venue for this, but couldn't find a better one. Right now this page contains a enormous list of IRC commands, but does not indicate why they are notable, as a list, in any way. On the other hand, its an easy look up, and is linked in multiple places across the wider Wikimedia verse, including Mediawikiwiki (see MediaWiki on IRC#Connecting to IRC), indicating there is a clear need and wish for a page such as this to exist. I therefore think the best solution, considering its, at least in my opinion, a non notable list, but is clearly wanted, would be to move it either into the Wikipedia: namespace, or to transwiki it to meta, which would be my preferred solution. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 11:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Every messenger has commands, and we don't need page for each. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:LISTN. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:LISTN. [1] [2] [3] [4] IRC is not a "messenger", it's a protocol. This is in principle no different from List of HTTP status codes which is also similarly referenced by RFC documents. – SD0001 (talk) 11:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above keep Madbrad200 (talk) 14:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree. SD0001 makes a good case. Dream Focus 17:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTHOWTO. Ajf773 (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As SD0001 notes, this passes WP:LISTN just as any list of protocols; all of which serve WP:LISTPURP#Information. It is not WP:NOTHOWTO because it is not a "guide" (i.e., there are no instructions to follow). -Tiredmeliorist (talk) 14:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a list of commands and how they are used, including a reference to someones work describing them in further detail. How is it not a guide. Ajf773 (talk) 08:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So you're saying that, because this article references a guide, the entire article should be deleted? That seems a bit extreme, no? If you think the reference violates WP:V, why not WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM instead?

And anyway, as someone who hasn’t used IRC since like 2001, I forget how or where to use these commands. This article does nothing to help me. So if the title included the word "guide" I would take serious issue with that. -Tiredmeliorist (talk) 22:13, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per user:Tiredmeliorist. Christian75 (talk) 07:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as it is a notable list topicJackattack1597 (talk) 16:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.