Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian footballers who have played for foreign clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian footballers who have played for foreign clubs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by article creator, no rationale given. No evidence of notability, and AfD consensus exists for these type of lists not being inherently notable. Giant Snowman 09:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Based on the AfD provided by Snowman. Also there is false information in the article as well. There is also a lack of sources to prove anything so it also fails WP:GNG as well. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Football_in_india, if possible. ~dee^(talk?) 20:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If all the information here were properly referenced, then I would have supported to keep it, because, it is a big deal for Football in India, as India is ranked among the lowest ones in the world. But, in the present form, it will propagate wrong information beyond Wikipedia, and possibly would be a source of constant vandalism from the unregistered editors.--GDibyendu (talk) 19:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 01:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's a short list that does not seem to add much value to the encyclopedia. As mentioned above, such lists are not inherently notable. - Mr X 02:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non needed list JayJay^{What did I do?} 03:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.