Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Gundam fix figuration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gundam fix figuration

As per WP:NOTCATALOG; article looks like an online catalog (I know because I did the organizing), also the main reason why it was deleted on the (now-deleted) Master Grade and HGUC articles. Items listed here are not "notable sales of rare collectors items" and has no other justified reason to have an article or part of an article here in Wikipedia (although it might be useful in the mech's own articles and (maybe) in other Gundam-related wikis). E Wing (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the original contributor of the list, then I can't argue about keeping it. However it proved to be very useful to me, as there is scarce non-Japanese material about GFF, and because that's the only complete listing which cited the different variations for each figure. As you suggested, maybe in the Gundam Wikia pages such listing would be more appropriated, as there is already a listing for HGUC releases. So for me it is ok to delete this page, but then I'd like to have a link to the external GFF release list at Wikia. If you agree I will setup such entry there. Mgmalheiros (talk) 20:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your talkpage. All that was left to do is that some admin here will allow such kind of external link. E Wing (talk) 03:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Remove the prices, and it isn't catalog, but a legitimate list for a notable toy line. If the action figures are from a popular series, they normally get listed somewhere. Dream Focus 16:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Looks like a catalog to me, but some cleanup can be done to fix that. I've removed the wordpress reference, blogs aren't reliable sources. If the toyline can be found to have more reliable third party sources and a suitable lead written, it can potentially be improved. Thats a big if, but the possibility is there. I do agree with the suggestion the information be copied to a wikia though. Dandy Sephy (talk) 16:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nuke from oribt; it's the only way to be sure. Product/price catalog. --EEMIV (talk) 21:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a catalog, not advertising.Bali ultimate (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not here - Very much like a catalog and a collectors checklist :( Its greatest fail is that it is something for Fans while articles in Wikipedia should aim to appeal to the widest readers audience. The numbers of Reliable Sources found ( or to be found) to verify the exactitude of this article that won't solve that issue unfortunately. So the best would be to trans-wiki it to a more Gundam fans focused place or to ~~use carpet bombing on it~~ delete it. --KrebMarkt 18:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete great info for Gundam fans, not so great for wikipedia readers. Wikia is the place for this. --Oscarthecat (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not here - Find a good place to put this information. For collectors this would be a good list, but not for general readers. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 02:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.