Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Filipino superheroes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Filipino superheroes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDISCRIMINATE list with a huge percentage of entries being non-notable or devoid of context. Even if cleaned up there’s no reason to have a list for this topic since no information can be provided by one that wouldn’t work better in prose or category format. Dronebogus (talk) 09:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Lists. Dronebogus (talk) 09:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:INDISCRIMINATE per nom. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 04:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Category:Filipino superheroes shows enough valid entries for an article to exist. This article just needs to prune the non-notable entries. It could also be merged to a list for Category:Filipino comics characters. Dream Focus 07:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and limit to notable entries. There are enough notable entries to maintain a list. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think it's a good enough list.

Keep. Meets WP:NLIST, the topic grouping is notable ([1][2][3]), inclusion criter is clear. Maybe a bit more curation is needed but not a reason for deletion. —siro χ o 11:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per siroxo and Dream Focus above. List topic seems fine as far as NLIST and INDISCRIMINATE. Not convinced that limiting the list to notable superheroes would be an improvement but the list does definitely have some problems, particularly with in-text hyperlinks and unreferenced entries. -- Visviva (talk) 21:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.