Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Family Guy writers
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 14:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Family Guy writers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnecessary listing of people who are already on the episode list StewieBaby05 (talk) 21:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'm not seeing how people being on the episode list makes this unnecessary? I'd lean towards procedural close based on this nom, but then the article is totally unreferenced. That said, referencing this article would be extremely easy, and I see this as being a valid list with WP:SURMOUNTABLE issues. The article has been around since 2009, and no objection had ever been raised before. Lukeno94 (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Names of writers are already mentioned in the episode list (and other Family Guy-related pages. Even when it was created in 2009, the page is against what Wikipedia is not: just mere spinoffs. Even referencing names and episodes do not absolve how unnecessary this list is, even if a show could reach 20 seasons. --George Ho (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I was unaware of this page until now. --George Ho (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Most of the writers have their own articles. This list aids in navigation. Information some might want to see, all laid out here, easy to find and process, you not having to go through dozens of articles to find them. If you like an episode, and you want to quickly find what other episodes the same writer made, this is useful. Dream Focus 01:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not redundant to have a list of writers, even if the list is formatted differently elsewhere. Jclemens (talk) 03:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Unnecessary listing of people.--Knight of Infinity (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful to readers, helpful to editors, quite sensible and logical. Also, rational. — Cirt (talk) 03:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Cirt (talk · contribs). JJ98 (Talk) 05:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.