Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of FHM 100 Sexiest Women
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Not encyclopedic. kingboyk 12:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of FHM 100 Sexiest Women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Basically a mirror of information from FHM. Wikipedia is not a mirror or indiscriminate collection of information. Wafulz 02:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A copyvio to boot. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 02:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete G12, per discussion. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How about including the URL it was copied from in the tag? Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 04:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. Doublechecked the site, and you're right, the G12 doesn't apply. I still stand by a delete though, per WP:LIST. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Site?! FHM is a magazine. You know, paper. I'm not sure this is a copyvio (it might be, it might not) but I'm deleting it anyway as unencyclopedic. --kingboyk 12:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not good for Wikipedia. Jet123 (Talk) 05:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.