Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Executives of the ASUC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 04:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Executives of the ASUC[edit]

Extremely non-notable list of student government presidents. SevernSevern (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep UC Berkeley is a fairly notable university, and this article's existence does not diminish other articles, as it could in a paper encyclopedia. SteveSims (talk) 03:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment That does not establish notability. Try to find some reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Wikipedia is not a web-host for the list of former officers of a student government.--SevernSevern (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unnecessary page - the Presidents (only) can be added to the main article which is why I am not looking for a merge. TerriersFan (talk) 00:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not-even-close-to-notable. CRGreathouse (t | c) 04:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. —SevernSevern (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although I do have to remind everyone that lists do not necessarily have to follow the same notability and citation formats as regular articles do (not that they don't have to follow it at all, it's just less strict). However, the subject itself must be encyclopedic — which this subject, unfortunately, is not. This article can always be integrated with a ASUC wiki if they have one, but not on Wikipedia. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 17:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 02:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.