Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ergo Proxy episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, this afd wasn't very useful since the only problem brought up was a copyright violation. It's still listed at WP:CP, and might get deleted through that. - Bobet 12:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ergo Proxy episodes[edit]

Speedy Delete copyvio from [1][2][3][4][5][6] Godsk 17:27, 7 October 2006 (UTC)— Godsk (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete WP:COPYVIO. QuiteUnusual 18:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Dytpe 19:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- The JPS ^{talk to me} 19:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete And don't forget to tag those screenshots as orphaned. The JPS ^{talk to me} 19:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Keep since it's being improved, but those images are not being used in accordance with our fair use policy. The JPS ^{talk to me} 10:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The images all have fair use rational write-ups for them. When there was / will be content for each episode they will be used in context and related to / significantly contributing to the article. Passes all points of WP:FUC. However, personally, I would choose some more distinguishing images. -- Ned Scott 06:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it be better to simply remove/rewrite the summaries? Most of the other information isn't really a copyright issue, and most anime articles have either an episode list in the article or a separate article for the episodes (and in the case of Naruto, individual articles for each episode). —TangentCube /c /t 22:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —TangentCube /c /t 22:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was afraid of this when the list got started, as noted here. However, removing the copyvios is a better solution than deleting the list. -- Ned Scott 22:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I think about it... keep per my comment above. It shouldn't be too hard to rewrite. —TangentCube /c /t 23:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've removed all the summaries so they can be re-written, and I'll keep an eye on the article (hopefully will get some time to write up some summaries myself). -- Ned Scott 23:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and continue to fix the article. Dekimasu 10:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite the summaries. —Meidosemme 15:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment see bugzilla:507--Godsk 17:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I may ask, what relevance does a nearly-2-year-old discussion on undeleting revisions have to do with the article in question? —TangentCube /c /t 20:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with remove and rewrite of copyvio summaries. --TheFarix (Talk) 23:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.