Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Emergency! characters (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A redirect may be created if absolutely necessary, but this is a highly unlikely search term. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of Emergency! characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not referenced and reeks of WP:OR. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Typical fan-wiki material, too crufty and OR-ful for our purposes. XOR'easter (talk) 00:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect To Emergency!#Cast. Not list material but can serve as a redirect. AmericanAir88(talk) 19:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Hey, Emergency! was a great show. I used to watch it as a kid (along with Adam 12). But, yeah, this is fancruft of the highest degree. No objection to a redirect, but not sure it's necessary. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: Per WP:CHEAP, a redirect would work out fine. AmericanAir88(talk) 17:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think it's necessary because that's an unlikely search term. But as I said, no objection either, and CHEAP is certainly a reasonable argument. RoySmith-Mobile (talk) 18:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.