Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Conan episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Conan episodes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL, merge into Conan (TV series) and recreate when there is information. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's pointless. Even in your reason for deletion, you state the article should be recreated. Gage (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a forthcoming issue of TV Guide. Carrite (talk) 00:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It may not be but the article is well sourced and not to far in the future. Derild 49 21 ☼ 02:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NOTDIR and WP:CRYSTAL. What is there to list for such a show? Guests and dates? With fiction, there's at least a plot summary of some sort of historical relevance. With late night talk shows, there's nothing notable to keep. Though apparently there is List of The Daily Show episodes which redirects to a guests list, and List of Colbert Report episodes which actually also seem like a violation of WP:NOTDIR.--90.0.130.131 (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, esp IP right above me....like s/he says, what is there to list, date and guests? I wouldn't think episodes would have names, like most tv shows. CTJF83 chat 23:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Incubate for a month. It would not make sense to delete a solidly established article that will in all likelihood be recreated in a month.--Pink Bull 04:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate per Pink Bull seems like a reasonable suggestion to me. Jenks24 (talk) 14:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.