Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canadian top eight finishers at the 2004 Summer Olympics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of Canadian top eight finishers at the 2004 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- List of Canadian athletes at the 2004 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) added related article to this nomination for the same reasons Andrwsc 23:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
These pages This page survived an AfD discussion in August 2004, but I am re-nominating it them. At the time, I think editors were afraid that we would delete information not found elsewhere, and their national passions were high, so many people voted to keep. Now, 2½ years later, we see that the contents of this article are fully redundant with a section of Canada at the 2004 Summer Olympics, and that this article remains totally orphaned. In the Olympics WikiProject, we have consensus that this type of information is best located and maintained on the appropriate "Nation at the year Olympics" articles. There is no reason for athletes from one nation, at one Games, should have this alternate, unique, duplicate, article. Andrwsc 22:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Redundant per nom and compiled in an almost unreadable format. Also, why top 8? Usually only the top 3 (gold, silver, bronze) are the only ones featured like this. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom for the second list as well. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Andrwsc. Punkmorten 15:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.RaveenS 17:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.