Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Boston Borough Councillors who have changed their political affliation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as G7 - author request at AfD. TerriersFan (talk) 18:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List of Boston Borough Councillors who have changed their political affliation[edit]
- List of Boston Borough Councillors who have changed their political affliation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This pretty much defines listcruft, especially since this doesn't seem to be a very odd occurance for this council. Just no real point to it. User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 11:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge. Possibly merge with Boston Borough Council elections, 2007, but even that looks barely notable. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 15:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Boston Borough Council elections, 2007 as a relevant related event. TerriersFan (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Merge to Boston Borough Council elections, 2007 seems sensible as all those on the list are from since the 2007 election. Would be an appropriate section (post election?) on that article but not notable as a seperate article/list. Davewild (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2008 (UTC) Changed to Delete as per creators remarks at bottom of this AFD. Suggest he uses userspace from now on for testing. Davewild (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. On its own, this is listcruft and a very unlikely search term. Luinfana (talk) 05:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is actually a test page and does not contain accurate material. I was experimenting with formatting styles. This is hence, why it is purposly listcruft material. Rlarrington (talk) 08:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.