Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Blue1 destinations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Blue1 destinations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In a 2018 RFC it was decided that lists of airline destinations are essentially a failure of WP:NOT, specifically WP:NOTDIRECTORY. WP:NOTTRAVEL is also relevant and also failed here. EDIT: A subsequent AN discussion concluded that these articles should be AFD'd in an orderly manner with a link to the original RFC discussion and that it should be taken into account in any close.

In addition this article is a clear failure of notability standards, as the only sources cited appear to be a PR website, the Tampere Convention Bureau, and a 404 link to the Anna Aero website. None of these are independent, reliable sources. My WP:BEFORE failed to find any sources that would remedy this even if the WP:NOT and RFC problems were over-come some how.

In reality, even if WP:NOT were overcome, in order to meet notability standards sourcing would have to pass WP:CORP and extend beyond specialist/industry press. FOARP (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Finland. FOARP (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Blue1 Jack4576 (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jack4576 - For a merge to be appropriate, these destinations would have to be reliably sourced. FOARP (talk) 15:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{cn}} can be added, would be a shame to just delete this work Jack4576 (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No point keeping stuff that isn’t reliably sourced and can be deleted at any time. We already had an RFC on this content. FOARP (talk) 20:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not seeing the point of merging, agree this is WP:NOT Dronebogus (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above, this list is essentially useless. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 00:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.