Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Blu-ray 3D releases

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Blu-ray 3D releases[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIR. This is basically a list of movies that have been released on the Blu-ray 3D disc format. Such a list is not very encyclopedic, especially since the format is growing fast and new titles are being released each week. This would be similar to a list article of every movie released on DVD. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Basically, to compare, pages like List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System games make sense because, y'know, a new SNES game doesn't come out every five seconds. Plus that page is just a really, really long table list. AdoTang (talk) 21:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Simply WP:NOTCATALOGUE. Ajf773 (talk) 09:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as too broad in scope, per WP:SALAT. Too ubiquitous to be of encyclopedic value. Not seeing this as different from listing all VHS releases, all DVD releases, etc. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't see a solid reason why it should exist. Kolma8 (talk) 17:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per all fails GNG. Setreis (talk) 08:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.