Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Battlefield 1942 mods (second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of Battlefield 1942 mods (second nomination)[edit]
Has been transwikied to Wikibooks. (Wikipedia is not a repository of external links)--Zxcvbnm 02:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because it has been transwikied. :) --Starionwolf 03:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Speedy Delete depending on whether CSD A5 applies when the transwiking did not occur as the result of a deletion (or other) debate. Morgan Wick 04:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Adambiswanger1 04:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom Bwithh 20:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Nice intro that does a good job of explaining Battlefield 1942 mods + fine list. --JJay 00:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with main Battlefield 1942 article. I don't really understand why it's been transwikied to Wikibooks. How does this fit the format of a book or textbook? --Adrift* 06:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or at the very worst merge. Contains dozens of highly notable games featured magazines, game sites, and thousands of google hits. Bfelite 14:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as gamecruft and listcruft. -- Hirudo 15:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Gosh, why is Zxcvbnm so dedicated to delete all Bf1942-related articles? Is he a worker of some competing software company or something? //Halibutt 15:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There's already been discussion about this a month ago. I would have preferred to see intervening dialogue on the article talk page rather than such another AfD after such a short time. It is a very popular game and it's a well compiled article. I don't see why Wiki can't accommodate it. Tyrenius 16:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for all reasons mentioned above. --W++ 17:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per reasons outlined above; at least provide an alternative that makes sense, like merging. syphonbyte 20:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's exceptionally useful. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 07:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the list per WP:NOT a web directory. Where has it been transwikied to? Kusma (討論) 15:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.