Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of B105 personalities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of B105 personalities[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN. Has only 1 source and numerous non notable entries. LibStar (talk) 01:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia isn't to be used the same way https://www.hit.com.au/shows is. Nate • (chatter) 02:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Radio, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 09:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per Nate. This is basically trivia. Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:LISTCRUFT. Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:46, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - @Doctorhawkes: Listcruft is not a reason for deletion, it is someone's essay. Deus et lex (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per core content policies on lists, an integral part of the guideline on stand-alone lists. Fluff is fluff by any other name. This is pure, unadulterated individual work. -The Gnome (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.