Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Azealia Banks' controversies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Azealia Banks' controversies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this article (a borderline attack page, which has had some material suppressed) is an unnecessary fork from Banks' main article and goes against the spirit of our biographies of living persons guideline and gives undue weight to very minor internet controversies and brief spats (see also: WP:COATRACK). There may be reliable sources on some of Banks' various feuds, but not every single one of them needs to be recorded per WP:NOTNEWS; especially given how Banks has attacked and criticized most mainstream celebrities at this point. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 14:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Popular culture. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 14:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A lot of is poorly sourced, unencyclopedic, and tangentially, giving air to the Internet rants posted by a woman who is better known for her feuds than her music at this point. Ss112 00:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The nominator nailed all the relevant policy violations. The fact that Ms. Banks is always in a beef with someone is already described adequately at her main article, and a list has no encyclopedic value. The Disputes and controversies section at her article could be cleaned up too, with a general summary rather than a few isolated examples. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and those above. There is no justification for a separate article on the "controversies" of the subject. BD2412 T 15:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.