Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian Air Force Cadet units

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 22:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Australian Air Force Cadet units[edit]

List of Australian Air Force Cadet units (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
List of Australian Navy Cadet units (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
List of Australian Army Cadet units (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article serves only as an index/directory. It has no information that needs to be here that would not already available on the organisation's website. Not fit for purpose to have its own article or to be on here at all. Tytrox (talk) 10:05, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nomination. The lists themselves are regularly outdated by changes within each organisation. Also added List of Australian Army Cadet Units as it follows the same line — IVORK Discuss 02:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and per user:IVORK. This is below the level of material that we should be investing in keeping up to date. bd2412 T 22:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.