Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Assiut University alumni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be redirected if desired. Sandstein 06:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Assiut University alumni[edit]

List of Assiut University alumni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced duplication of Category:Assiut University alumni created by a sock puppet of globally locked cross-wiki SPA Eslam Ossama (talk · contribs) DrKay (talk) 07:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Seems like a pretty standard sort of list, and lists don't duplicate categories, but with such a short list it probably makes most sense to merge it into the university article. Not !voting at this time because I haven't checked that there are actually sources in the linked articles showing those people are alumni, and also because I'm not sure about the sock puppetry issue (which would be a reason for speedy, no?). I see a suspected sock tag, but no SPI, no block, etc. -- on what basis are you saying it's a sock puppet? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per above. If it had any good references or were created in good faith (rather than by a promotion-only sock puppet), I would probably say delete or merge. Going through to revert some of the promotion in his contribs now. Should also add 41.233.173.182 to the list. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If the creator is a sock then recommend Delete first and then create redirect. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:04, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. No opinion on keep/delete, but please see WP:NOTDUP where it says "Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.