Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Armenian footballers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per consensus and the absence of deletion requests beyond the nominator. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Armenian footballers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is redundant to Category:Armenian footballers. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lists and categories go hand-in-hand, per WP:CLN. Also part of a bigger scheme of Category:Lists of footballers by country. Lugnuts (talk) 09:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lugnuts. Str8cash (talk) 05:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lists allow information to be organized in ways that categories cannot. Edward321 (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this particular list is an unsourced and indiscriminate. It could be made useful, but right now the category it duplicates is far superior. I think deletion is appropriate unless someone is going to improve this list (and no one has for years). Jogurney (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Why not? Could need better structure, though. Ref may or may not provide stats for the listed players. Nageh (talk) 20:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.