Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Argentine Jews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. It has become apparent that individual nominations of each list of this type is pointless, and a consensus on what to do with the entire group of lists of this type is needed, and will result in a broader consensus with less work. I have created a discussion page at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Lists of Ethnic Americans to try and determine a policy on these type of lists. Please join the discussion there. Thank you. Leuko 14:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Argentine Jews

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Portuguese Americans, relisting as individual AfD's. Precedent for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of German Americans. Leuko 17:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And the rationale for the nomination is..? Beit Or 18:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same as at the listed AfD - apparently the new consensus is that these lists should be deleted per the arguments on that AfD, as well as DRV. Leuko 18:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletions. —Noroton 22:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong, speedy keep - Important aid for researchers. We only include notable individuals in these lists and they are well sourced. As with previous ethnic group nominations, this nomination, apparently done along with dozens if not hundreds of others all in a single day, is disruptive, WP:POINT, and does not enhance our encyclopedia. This manner of disruption should be eschewed in the strongest terms. Improve, don't delete. Badagnani 01:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. I agree with ExRat (in other discussions) and Badagnani. In addition, this mass nomination is too POINTY. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.