Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Alarm für Cobra 11 – Die Autobahnpolizei episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Alarm für Cobra 11 – Die Autobahnpolizei episodes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no encyclopedic content in this table at all. That would mean it fails per WP:INDISCRIMINATE Ryan Vesey 02:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I fail to comprehend the deletion rationaile; lists of episodes of television series are something included in Wikipedia, and when they get too long to be included in the actual page for the series, they get spun off, per procedure and guideline. What is indiscrciminate here? Perhaps the table formatting is atrocious, but AfD is not for cleanup. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Bushranger; episode lists are standard for dramatic TV series. The deletion nom is lacking substance; asserting that it is WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC is not good enough. postdlf (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is certain it has more WP:NOTABILITY from the TV series, instead of not enough informative information to which is reliable enough for an article.--GoShow (...............) 23:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.