Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 9/11 memorials
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. Strong consensus exists for redirecting to Memorials and services for the September 11 attacks without merge due to completeness of primary article (non-admin closure). Moogwrench (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- List of 9/11 memorials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Much more detailed article on similar subject already exists (Memorials and services for the September 11 attacks). Was originally a disambig page, but the disambig page has been recreated with better disambig styling (9/11 memorial (disambiguation)). | helpdןǝɥ | 06:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pretty clear duplication, but I don't see why you can't just do a merge/redirect? 86.164.110.80 (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Because all of the information in this article is included in greater detail on the other page. Plus, I think that if Wikipedia has gone 10 years without needing this redirect, it definitely doesn't need it now... | helpdןǝɥ | 17:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Memorials and services for the September 11 attacks -- a straight redirect, with no deletion and no merge needed. I do think that Wikipedia needs this redirect, because apparently the person who created List of 9/11 memorials didn't know about or couldn't find Memorials and services for the September 11 attacks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:17, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Good point. | helpdןǝɥ | 17:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Metropolitan90. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.