Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 88 Films releases

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 November 16.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of 88 Films releases[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced list of films that are or will be reissued. Smell of advertising The Banner talk 13:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MERGE should be merged with the 88 films article, sourced of course.Zlassiter (talk) 13:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 88 Films and consider the whole thing as one entity. The size of the two articles mean that one article (at most) is sufficient. --Michig (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a suitable list article and borrow sources from the MANY blue-linked films on that list. Expand with info from the studio's article. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- "88 films" is not a film production company but a re-issuing label. The Banner talk 17:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note the parent article was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/88 Films. postdlf (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

for all the problems you seem to be finding, how about messaging me first before deciding to delete my work. if you're going to delete this article, then i suggest you delete every other article which is similar to mine. list of arrow films, list of.....films. you see my point. there is a category. Lists of films by home video label. this is my contribution to that category. it is a complete list which i update every time 88 films make an announcement. it is simply a reference article for collectors who wish to collect their films. my references on the article got removed not by me. whereas the list of arrow films have references that link their titles to their website for purchase. i do not have these links on my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kn5150 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @Michig and Zlassiter: Merge is no longer possible. What are your views now? Sandstein 22:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- with 88 Films being a red link, does not make sense to keep a list of its releases, as it borders on WP:LISTCRUFT. Nothing else connects these titles outside of a non notable production company. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/88 Films: article has been deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the parent article itself isn't notable, this can't be either. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 07:56, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this doesn't make sense to keep since notability is not inherited. -- Dane2007 ^talk 04:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.