Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lishan Bus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 22:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lishan Bus[edit]

Lishan Bus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus manufacturer - Fails BASIC/GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:35, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:35, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Lishan is a notable bus builder of size in China. It has it's own Chinese wikipedia page [1]. Scoty6776 (talk)
  • Yet, if you look at the Chinese WP page, although it has a little more information, it is just as devoid of sources as this one. -- HighKing++ 17:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The bus manufacturer having an article on another project is irrelevant here - As noted by HighKing the Chinese article is just as bad as this one however all projects have different standards so I shan't comment on the fact that that Chinese article is still up!. –Davey2010Talk 17:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The absence of any sources makes it impossible to !vote any other way. If sources turn up, I'll be glad to reconsider though. Right now, it fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 17:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.