Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Morgan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Morgan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources given are passing mentions and I cannot find any reliable WP:SIGCOV. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 20:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 20:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 20:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 20:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It is not notable, per WP:GNG. AnotherEditor144^{talk contribs} 09:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

keep since she has a UK Who's Who entry Piecesofuk (talk) 15:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded the article a little with a number of references from The Times Piecesofuk (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added Guardian reference which reported that she was the highest paid woman employed by a UK-quoted company in 2007; and Daily Telegraph interview reference Piecesofuk (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because there are improvements going on. AnotherEditor144^{talk contribs} 20:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)#[reply]

Keep as per new sources added which have now strengthen its notability. Luciapop (talk) 06:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.