Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Garcia Quiroz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Garcia Quiroz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. She has a job, is a graduate of Harvard, is on the board of the Hispanic Scholarship Fund and has given a speech. None of that adds up to anything. Two of the three "sources" are the same, presumably a self-written resumé. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Whoever created this page, I assume, thought this sentence was the money ticket: "In 2010, Garcia Quiroz was nominated by Barack Obama, and confirmed by the United States Senate, as chair of the Corporation for National and Community Service." But basically, she's a civil servant. If she need be mentioned at all, it should be in the article the Corporation for National and Community Service.--Esprit15d • talkcontribs 01:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. Lisa Garcia Quiroz is notable. She launched two businesses with Time Inc. as a founding publisher of multiple magazines, including People en Español and Time For Kids. Precedent has been set for posting Wiki articles for individuals with this credential as there are other publishers and editors with Wiki articles, including: Andrew Heiskell (People and Life magazines) and Nancy Gibbs (Time Magazine).

She is also the first Chief Diversity Officer of Time Warner Inc., a global leader in media and entertainment with businesses in television networks and filmed entertainment. Whether measured by quality, popularity or financial results, the divisions (Home Box Office, Turner Broadcasting System, and Warner Bros. Entertainment) are at the top of their categories. Precedent has been set for posting Wiki articles for individuals with this credential as other Executive Vice Presidents and Chief Diversity Officers have Wiki articles, including David L. Cohen (Comcast), Mark Lloyd (Federal Communications Commission), and Moises Salinas (Central Connecticut State University). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timewarnercsr (talkcontribs) 15:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Timewarnercsr (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Notable business executive. Won awards. Numerous WP:RS with in-depth nontrivial coverage easily meets the WP:GNG with [this source and this source, many others (see Wikipedia article on her). That Obama nominated her for a prestigious committee is icing on the cake. Successful media executive with launches of successful magazines.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It would appear that SPA edits automatically trigger the notice about WP:CANVASsing. If true, this poisons the well, violates WP:DONTBITE, if not WP:AGF, and is ad hominem, as is shown by Timewarnercsr's argument, which although it suffers from the same drawbacks as all OTHERSTUFF arguments, is obviously carefully considered and not a WP:VOTE in the slightest. Anarchangel (talk) 02:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.