Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa-Marie Long (Presenter/Actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:04, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa-Marie Long (Presenter/Actress)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently Created page a couple of sources out here but not much Weaponbb7 (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, although with some doubts. She is not notable as an actress, since in the only movie that she played in that is mentioned in the article she was a minor character, but she might be notable as a television personality. I think that she might meet the first part of WP:ENT, as having multiple significant roles in television shows (hosting events and shows on notable TV channels). --Slon02 (talk) 17:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment ahhh... the futility of Find searches that do not create a suitable search parameter. With the less search-confusing and simpler "Lisa-Marie Long" we find she has a few sources... but independence and reliability is quite questionable with such "finds' as being a "poker presenter" interviewed in such as UK Poker News and then one has to ask oneself, is being a presenter/host for TV and online poker games notable in any way, when accompanied by minor roles in a very few films?[1] She does not seem to get any coverage outside the poker industry itself. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.