Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lioni.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn website/company.--Sfffb 14:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Sfffb 14:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article list clear under companies. All the listed categories might not be correct, but that can be adjusted. Like moving them only to the Japanese categories section. The article is only explaining the company name. There is no link to the company and the article tryed to be objective in writing. If there is anything in the wording to be change than please suggest it or do an edit. All over I think it can stay, so keep it. First-timer 15:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- One thing that you should say, but haven't, is to cite sources to demonstrate that this company satisfies our WP:CORP criteria. Wikipedia is not a business directory. You have cited no sources at all, either here or in the article. Please cite sources. Uncle G 17:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for pointing out WP:CORP. Under these terms the company and its name do not meet the creteria at this point. So I removed the article contant. First-timer 05:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- One thing that you should say, but haven't, is to cite sources to demonstrate that this company satisfies our WP:CORP criteria. Wikipedia is not a business directory. You have cited no sources at all, either here or in the article. Please cite sources. Uncle G 17:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 15:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Jusjih 15:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete this article only talks in substantial detail about the name, so qualifies as CSD A1. Danny Lilithborne 00:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; also agree with Speedy. Neier 00:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete since the article content was removed First-timer 05:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.