Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lion Express

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible WP:HOAX. Search found no evidence for the newspaper. Not listed at: http://naiindia.com/mi.html scope_creep (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, unless there is other deletion criteria present: It [is] real, but as for whether the information in the article is true, I don't know. El ₵id, El ₵ampeador ‡ _{Talk} 18:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, the Indian government doesn't think of this as a hoax.[1] The paper exists and has quite a decent circulation, if the Indian government's circulation figures are to be believed. But this is not to say that every newspaper with a decent circulation needs to be kept. Lourdes 19:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That site looks as though it was put up yesterday. Certainly they seemed to have come into existence on Jan 19, 2015, but doesn't seem to reflect on what you would find as a normal web based newspaper. Seems to be orientated towards the yoof hence the look and feel. I think we can close. Withdrawn by Nominator Clearly a real paper. scope_creep (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have added that ref, which is a start for this wee micro article. scope_creep (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.