Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Air Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lion Air#History. Content remains behind the redirect for merging if desired. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:41, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lion Air Australia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This collaboration never seemed to “take off” (if you’ll pardon the pun.) Should we still allocate an entire page to a project that is extremely unlikely to ever launch, after one of the major partners went into liquidation more than 10 years ago? At the very least it probably needs to be merged rather than kept as it is. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Limited Merge with redirect to Lion Air#History. LA was the minority partner due to regulations (?) but the airline was intended as part of their expansion strategy[1]. Also see id:Aussie Batik. Batik Air#History is later and sufficiently different in scope to not be a suitable target. Note that the principal author tried to prod/speedy it back in 2010... ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 06:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. the collaboration indeed never did "take off" *hahaha* Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 13:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It was just an idea or plan, and the unrealized one. It should just be in a small "part" (2 lines) in Lion Air. Not merge but delete - Jay (talk) 08:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.