Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linx Dating

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete not notable. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linx Dating[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam of a non-notable company by a series of COI editors. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Ordinary, non-notable company, one of countless like it. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Another run-of-the-mill dating agency. Nothing to indicate why this is notable. Donnie Park (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this should be speedied for sheer promotion. The article gives a glowing account of the business ("her continued success" "clients at Linx have achieved great success in their lives"), yet leaves off a number of salient features (like the $25K fee to join). LaMona (talk) 05:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches noticeably found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.