Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinkedIn Open Networker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LinkedIn Open Networker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An IP, Special:Contributions/70.31.11.216, tried to nominate the article for deletion using the wrong template. The IP's rationale is on the talk page: "This is at best an ad of a LinkedIn.com sub group. I reads like the founder wrote it. All the sources are pretty fluffy as well. Also goes as far as to claim other similar linkedin sub groups are copying or possibly infringing." I offer no opinion on the deletion. John of Reading (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a vanity page for a linked in group. There are hundreds/thousands of linked in groups and they can't all have a page on wikipedia if we create a precedent by keeping this. There is also a non-notability argument - outside of a few hardcore linked in users, this term means precisely nothing. ChrisUK (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete not notable. Greglocock (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – the subject at hand does not merit its own encyclopedia article (and in addition, the current article is written like an advertisement). 88.113.185.91 (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.