Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsey Stamey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsey Stamey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed. No reliable sources to establish notability of a musician. Google News didn't turn up anything promising. Plenty of sources are given as references, but they are blogs, facebook/myspace links, or alternative papers (MetroPulse). tedder (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like a vanity page, insufficient sourcing leads me to believe the subject is non-notable, better sourcing and this could be better DRosin (talk) 01:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:BAND, Google shows little, and the use of blogs as references is wholly unacceptable. — ♣№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė♫♪ 06:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A7, fails WP:BAND. Lots of references, none are reliabel. RadioFan (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.