Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincoln Cannon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lincoln Cannon[edit]
- Lincoln Cannon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person: references are, for the most part, affiliated, trivial, non-reliable, or more than one of the above. Possible COI on the part of the major editor or editors involved. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant ocverage about him in reliable sources. The sourcing in the article isn't about him. It's links to works which he is author or co-author, or the article merely mentions him. -- Whpq (talk) 16:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Could find nothing about him in a search. The article is heavily sourced, but most of the sources are self-referential. --MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing here is notable. DGG ( talk ) 03:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.