Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lime studio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lime studio[edit]
- Lime studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prodecural nom. Was tagged for speedy A7. While it certainly seems to lack notability, I think there's a claim of importance there. Unless independent references and something to support WP:N turns up, it should be deleted. Marasmusine (talk) 10:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:N – ukexpat (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Reads like a sales pitch, don't see much in the way of notability.Helixweb (talk) 23:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 Midway upon life's journey... 23:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.