Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilith Games

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 04:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lilith Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable video game company MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete All the coverage seems to be trivial. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Guidelines for notability state there must be multiple references. There is one reference posted by Dream Focus above from Technode that meets the criteria for establishing notability as it is significant and in-depth coverage containing Independent Content. But unfortunately I have been unable to locate a second reference - all the rest are rehashed press releases and promotions and announcements. If another reference is found by anyone, ping me and I will revisit my !vote. But, here and now, topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 12:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.