Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liliana Domínguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liliana Domínguez[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically unsourced article, tagged as such for a decade. Absolutely no Google news hits, a general Google search returns not much more (and nothing really reliable). Fails WP:NBLP and WP:SIGCOV. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Fashion. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I find photos of her on various runways, but nothing we can use to build an article here. Beyond simply confirming that she exists, nothing for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For the only source link provided for the article, I tried to verify the first few items in the "Magazine Covers" section, and it turns out that none of them lines up with the magazine covers that they claim to be. It is pretty clear that the source site Fashion Model Directory can not be used as a reliable source of Information. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 01:40, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the sources I find are just name drops because she was the model in the image. Useless for Wikipedia. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 04:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG. Sarrail (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.