Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LightSpire
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- LightSpire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The articles seems to be about an upcoming gaming mod which has yet to be fully developed and does not appear to have received coverage from reliable sources. The information from the article comes from a forum post by the mod's creators and all the sources I can find using Google[1] seem to be from forums or self promotion and do not show the kind of significant coverage by reliable, independent sources required to meet the general notability criteria or to verify the information within the article. Guest9999 (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - sources given not reliable or indepdendent enough to establish notability. I don't think game mods are notale on their own anyway (unless they pass the general notability guidelines).--Boffob (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The creator says it all on the article's talk page. Pure crystalballery that has no present notability and unlikely to receive any. Even primary sources aren't working. LeaveSleaves talk 13:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.