Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liferuiner
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. More sources have been found and the consensus seems to be this can be expanded upon. -- Mgm|(talk) 09:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Liferuiner[edit]
- Liferuiner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article definitely does not meet most, if any, of the notability standards set out for musical ensembles. Notability aside, this article seems to mainly focus on promoting the activities of its many members. Synchronism (talk) 01:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep The band seems to have achieved some notoriety and success including record deal [1]. I lean towards inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why this is in the AfDs for Fiction and the Arts and not in Media in Music? -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I found the following articles about the band:
- Chen, Dalson. "Living life on straight, narrow", The Windsor Star, 2005-09-19, p. A5. (Entirely about the band and their music)
- An article in The Globe and Mail about band members' arrests during a tour of Canada and the U.S.
- Along with the two album releases on two notable record labels, this all adds up to a weak keep in my view—the band might just barely meet WP:MUSIC criteria #1, they are a tad short on #4, and just barely short on #5 (because it's two separate labels). Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 06:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per sources found by User:Paul Erik above, although the article needs some really, really heavy cleanup if kept. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:57, 28 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.