Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life of Black Tiger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nothing so controversial here to warrant an extraordinary third relist. A Traintalk 13:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Life of Black Tiger[edit]

Life of Black Tiger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was a suggestion a while ago but I didn't create it as I found it non-notable. The mention in Kotaku is not a "significant" one but only mentions it off hand as an example of one of the crappiest games promoted by Sony. That leaves Eurogamer and Jimquisition as the only significant mentions and according to WP:VG/S "[The Jimquisiton] cannot be used to demonstrate notability. It fails WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 01:47, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.