Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life in Frames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Life in Frames[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article about this recent album is among several WP:SPA-authored articles about a young musician and his recordings. The two sources in the article were also the main references in the now-deleted biographical article about Chokamkuru Langneh: see the assessments of these sources at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chokamkuru Langneh. I don't see these sources or any other coverage as providing the coverage needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:A9, because the musician has already been deleted for non-notability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chokamkuru Langneh. By the usual logic his releases are non-notable by definition unless they have any reliable coverage, and this one does not despite what looks like a lot of info and sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: There is another leftover article for the musician at You Wouldn't Know (Chokamkuru Langneh song), which I shall nominate for speedy deletion. There may be a problem because that article (and the album article) make claims of notability, no matter how unsupported they may be. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That song article has now been speedy deleted with support from WP:A9, and more speedily than I expected, so the same can be done for this album article ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per A9 as above. Now that the artist's article has been deleted, there are no good sources for this album – it's entirely sourced to an interview with the artist in his local newspaper, and a non-RS blog which promotes the artists and pays them for it. Richard3120 (talk) 22:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as WP:A9. SBKSPP (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.